Walmart workers unhappy about new 'dress code'

Some Walmart (WMT) employees are not happy about a new mandatory “dress code” or the fact that workers have to pay for clothes to comply with that dress code out of their own pockets.
The “new look” calls for employees to wear a navy blue or a white polo shirt and khaki or black pants or skirts. It also requires the return of the Walmart vest, but the company will pay for that.
The new dress code and the employee backlash were first reported by Gawker.
At issue is whether the new rules about what employees can wear amount to a “uniform” or a “dress code.” The U.S. Department of Labor says companies must pay for a "uniform," but not clothes required to comply with a "dress code."

.

From Walmart.com

So is it legal for Walmart to require its employees to pay for a polo shirt and pants of a certain color?
According to one legal expert, Walmart employees who are unhappy about having to pay up may have an uphill battle. Federal Advocacy Coordinator at the National Employment Law Project, Judy Conti, told The Guardian that what Walmart is doing is legal.
“When an employer selects clothing you could wear anywhere else, they are not required to pay for it,” Conti said. “Black or khaki pants – it doesn’t come more basic than that. White or navy blue shirt: now, maybe you don’t wear white or maybe you don’t wear navy, but I’ll bet you wear one of them.”
Heidi Moore of The Guardian tells Yahoo Finance she thinks Walmart is asking too much of employees who already make too little.
“It is pretty much an egregious issue… it’s a huge chunk of their take-home pay and Walmart employees have been complaining for years - and even staging protests and walk-outs – that they are not paid enough, that they’re not paid a living wage.”

Walmart says its average full-time hourly wage in the United States is $12.92. The company says employees are free to buy the clothes anywhere, however, Walmart also has extended an offer for employees to buy the clothes from Walmart for a 10% discount. If employees buy dress-code appropriate clothes (2 shirts and 2 pairs of pants) from the company's own website, that would add up to abour $48, after the company discount of 10%, which Moore says is "tiny" compared to other retailers' discounts.

"If you work at any other store, whether it’s Macy’s (M) or Club Monaco, Urban Outfitters, you get 50% discounts, sometimes 60% discounts, so it’s also pretty chintzy on that front,” she said.

Source : Yahoo Finance

How Small Choices Can Have a Big Impact On Your Money-AdviceIQ

I spend a lot of time helping people make financial choices, sometimes about business and sometimes about personal life. In both cases and in many more, breaking huge issues and questions into smaller choices makes problems much easier to manage. Big financial decisions, depending on your age, include getting married, buying a home, paying for college, securing enough insurance and retiring, to name just a few. Everything from nosy relatives to the latest market and international news pressures all of us to solidify these moves financially as soon as possible.

You can start with a financial plan, a written idea of big goals for your savings and when you want to hit those goals. Along the way, though, the problem arises when you try to decide too much too fast (in Great Britain, for example, some homebuyers ink a deal in as little as half an hour). People generally make most decisions under time pressure yet most decisions – let alone big financial ones – also take a lot of time, according to one study from the American Psychological Association.

Break big decisions into simple steps.

Stay away from sunk costs if you lack the time to recover

When you spend months and months planning something – a big purchase, a major investing initiative – you may have a hard time backing away. A sunk cost is one you already made and can’t get back, at least easily, so you feel committed. Most of the time you’ll need to retreat, if for no other reason than to reconsider once more. You never get back this planning time.
Better to start fast, move fast, change fast and stop fast. All of these are easier when changes are small and are almost impossible with big changes. Fail fast and fail cheap: Recover quickly from your missteps and move on.
Rarely does one of my ideas come out right the first time. I usually keep modifying and modifying – and then it’s still not right.
But the smaller the change I work on, the easier the change. If I spend days, weeks or months planning how to tinker with a major idea, that idea is going to be hard to change to fit evolving conditions, such as the stock market’s ups and downs.

Small choices are not complicated

Deciding what to do next when it’s a small choice is easy.
Keep questions about scrimping and saving for the future simple. Do you really need that top-of-the-line laptop or will a cheaper model do? How much can you save now?
After you get that raise at a plum new job, can you save more? What are the best investments for the next few years and how can you easily shift your retirement plan money to them?
Do you have lots of extra time for big projects? I bet no. But I bet you can always find time for a question that takes 15 or 20 minutes to answer. The small gets done easier than the big.

Yes or no becomes easier

Big projects come with big commitment if you say yes. If your choice involves a small matter, though, yes or no involves no big subsequent process. You also often get to start quicker – sometimes a big consideration in such aspects of financial plans as saving.

Small adds up to big

Cut a big project down to the smallest parts you can. Keep up with mortgage payments each month; open an individual retirement account; spend that half hour online not buying a house in the mountains, but Googling more sources of college financial aid.
When you string together a bunch of small projects, they become the big project: your mortgage paid off, your child’s tuition paid, your golden years spent in comfort. Communicate about finances with your spouse. Set your priorities. Create and, as time goes by, adjust your plan.
Make it small and make it easy.

Culled from cheatsheet

Richard Branson on Why Entrepreneurs Sometimes Struggle With Formal Education

Image credit: Richard Branson via Instagram

Q: I am an architect and a young entrepreneur. It’s fairly obvious that most of the world’s great entrepreneurs had issues with their early education. Why is this the case? -- Akosu Paul
This is a very good question, and one that I am often asked by students around the world as they weigh continuing their studies against starting up their own ventures and diving into the world of business. In addition, many also want to know how I was able to start my own career while I was a young student struggling with my schoolwork, and how I eventually got people to take me seriously as an entrepreneur.
Looking back, I believe that the qualities that make for a great entrepreneur -- such as boundless energy, a curious nature and, sometimes, an obstinate streak -- are not often attributes demonstrated by top students in the classroom. So it should not be very surprising that many of the world’s great entrepreneurs and business leaders had difficulties with formal education.
Often, their frustration in the classroom was a result of impatience: The greats were eager to get out and build their businesses, which pushed them to drop out of high school or forgo college in order to follow their dreams. For instance, Walt Disney famously dropped out of school at age 16 to found his animation company, while the great American tycoons of the late 19th century -- Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt and Thomas Edison -- had little or no formal education before they set out to seek their fortunes. Some entrepreneurs, including Carnegie and Henry Ford, the 20th century industrialist, came from impoverished backgrounds and did not have the support at home to start -- let alone complete -- their formal educations. Rather, they set up businesses to make ends meet and eventually flourished.
More recently, the retail entrepreneurs Philip Green and John Caudwell made their fortunes in the U.K. after leaving high school and building businesses at young ages. And in the tech industry, Steve Jobs of Apple, Michael Dell, the founder of Dell Inc., and Oracle’s Larry Ellison all dropped out of college to create their companies, and they all reaped the rewards of getting an early start.
One thing that entrepreneurs have in common is a talent for seeing things differently. This allows them to identify important gaps in markets or the need for new sectors to serve specific customer demands. But this ability often leads budding entrepreneurs to rebel against the conformity that is common in traditional education.
I was no exception, and I have written in previous columns that I was not great at school. I constantly pushed against rules and authority, and I liked to challenge the way that things were “always” done. My curiosity often got me into trouble with teachers.
But it was not just my attitude that was different -- I had dyslexia. When I was a young student, this learning disability was poorly researched and was often mistaken for laziness or a poor ability to learn. At school I was thought to be slow, and indeed I struggled to keep up. I initially channeled my youthful energy into sport, then after an injury, I got into early business ventures, which failed to take off.
But my learning disability has never been a setback -- it actually gave me a great advantage in business, since I have been able to bring a different perspective to problems and challenges, which often enables me to see solutions more clearly. For example, I have always hated jargon, and I am confused by long and wordy drafts of plans. So in Virgin’s early days, I would ask simple questions that others did not. Over the years, asking the simple questions and striving to answer them have become some of Virgin’s most important characteristics.
When I was a young student, my restlessness and curiosity prompted me to set up Student magazine when I was just 15. Running the magazine actually served as an entrepreneurial education - I learned to effectively build a team, sell advertising, create content and market a product. I was my own boss and never needed to ask permission to try new things, and if I got things wrong, I did not have to fear the wrath of a superior. After all, a willingness to try new things and fail is important to becoming an entrepreneur, yet making mistakes flies against the expectations of traditional schooling.
So in many ways, my education has been my career. For almost 50 years, Virgin’s varied collection of businesses and nonprofits means that I have studied and come to understand many sectors - aviation, banking, media, hospitality and the fitness industry, to name a few. More recently, my career has also given me interesting new perspectives on many significant issues such as climate change, conflict resolution and global health care.
In the end, solutions to big problems such as these won’t come from doing school reports, but by getting out there, asking questions, seeing things differently and finding the answers ourselves.

Culled from the Entrepreneur

DIY pensions: the six alternatives to an annuity-Richard Evans

Pensioners are now looking for alernatives to annuities, with many opting to generate their own retirement income through bonds and shares. Below we look at six ways to take on your own 'DIY' pension

With the Government's decision to scrap the effective compulsion to buy an annuity from next year, more and more people are taking the DIY route to ensure a useful and reliable retirement income Photo: Howard Mcwilliam

On last week’s front page we reported that American annuities paid about 7pc, compared with the 6pc available to British pensioners, and looked at the alternative of retaining your capital while investing it to obtain a comparable income.

This week we’ll look in more detail at how to generate a useful and reliable income from your retirement savings, assuming that you decide against an annuity. More and more people are taking this route in response to the Government’s decision in March to scrap the effective compulsion to buy an annuity, a change that will take effect in April next year.

One of the advantages of buying an annuity is that once you have done so there is no further effort involved – you will receive a steady income for the rest of your life without lifting a finger. But managing your own investments to produce an annuity-like income needn’t involve a huge amount of time and effort.

Below we look at six approaches to the problem, starting with the most “low-maintenance” – a fund that does everything for you – through to what amounts to acting as your own fund manager, buying and selling the most appropriate shares and bonds. We then look at some alternatives that avoid the financial markets altogether, such as peer-to-peer lending.

First though a word on practicalities. If you want to generate an income by owning shares, bonds or funds, you’ll need the services of an “investment shop”. These online platforms, also called fund supermarkets or fund shops, provide an easy way to buy, hold and sell investments in one place. They handle all the administration, including the tax side of Isas and Sipps – self-invested personal pensions.

The investments described on the right can be held in either of these tax-efficient schemes, or indeed outside them in ordinary “trading” accounts. Remember that tax is due on any income you take from your pension beyond the 25pc tax‑free lump sum.
Choosing the best investment shop for your needs is not always straightforward. For example, the cheapest option for an investor with, say £50,000, who chooses the first of our options – an all-in-one fund – may not be the cheapest if you choose to pick your own shares instead. Another investor with a larger sum to invest might be better off at a third fund shop. Our easy-to-use table here will help.
The income leveller
An all-in-one fund designed to pay a steady 4pc or 6pc income
For a steady income from a diverse range of investments, a “multi-asset” fund is ideal. Such funds come in two flavours: one that simply owns a mix of shares, bonds and other income-producing assets directly, and another that buys stakes in other funds.
This second is called a “multi-manager” fund or “fund of funds”. Here, the manager of the “parent” fund chooses the best equity fund managers, the best bond fund managers and so on, and splits his money among them.
A further refinement is to “smooth” the income produced by a multi-manager fund. This is what Old Mutual’s Generation range, which is aimed specifically at retired people, does.
The range consists of four multi-manager funds: two have a target income of 6pc, while two aim for 4pc. In each case there are variants that aim for a total return (capital growth plus income) of 3pc plus inflation and 4pc plus inflation The underlying assets are mostly shares, bonds and property, but with returns smoothed by the use of sophisticated financial products called “derivatives”. In effect, the use of derivatives tops up income when the assets fail to produce it naturally, but at the cost of sacrificing some returns when the investments outperform.
Use of derivatives would normally sound alarm bells with many investors, but the manager of Generation, John Ventre, said the funds were not at risk if the other parties to the derivative contracts defaulted because they paid Old Mutual upfront for the right to any excess returns.
Total costs are 2.04pc-2.15pc.
• Current expected yield: 4pc/6pc
• Who is it suitable for? Those who want income stability and a high degree of diversification from a single fund
• Pros: Greater certainty of income than from most funds
• Cons: Income certainty comes at the cost of potential capital gains; relatively high total charge from two-tier structure
• High or low maintenance: Very low
Your own panel of experts
'Multi-manager’ funds that see your money split among a group of professional investors
There are plenty of other multi-manager income funds in addition to the Old Mutual range, although without the income stabiliser. Among them are the F&C MM Navigator Distribution fund, managed by the respected team of Robert Burdett and Gary Potter. The fund yields 4.8pc and the total annual cost, including both layers of charges, is 1.53pc.
Other options include Jupiter Merlin Income (yield 2.8pc, total annual cost 2.36pc), managed by another experienced investor, John Chatfeild-Roberts, and Premier Multi Asset Monthly Income (yield 4.9pc, total cost 1.53pc), managed by David Hambidge.

The multi-manager approach provides huge diversification of your sources of income: for example, the F&C fund contains a total of about 2,400 underlying assets within its constituent funds.
One disadvantage of multi-manager funds is that you have to pay both the overall manager and those of the underlying funds, so the total cost is often higher.
• Who is it suitable for? Those who want the simplicity of owning a single fund with the advantages of a team of expert managers and good diversification
• Pros: Low risk to income thanks to very wide range of sources
• Cons: Two layers of cost
• High or low maintenance: Very low
Simple diversified funds
A wide range of assets from a single low-cost fund
This is the other type of “multi-asset” fund, the kind that avoids the two-tier structure of a fund of funds and simply owns its assets directly.
Many such funds are managed by a team, with specialists for shares and bonds, for example. A well run multi-asset fund will be less volatile than a single-asset fund because different markets do not normally rise and fall at the same time.
Philippa Gee of Philippa Gee Wealth Management tipped the JP Morgan Multi-Asset Income fund, which yields 3.6pc and has a total cost of 0.83pc, and the Aviva Investors Distribution fund (yield 3.6pc, total cost 0.74pc).
A similar mix of assets is also available through investment trusts. These are funds structured as companies whose shares you can buy on the stock market.
Multi-asset investment trusts include Scottish American (yield 4pc, total cost 0.9pc), which has a “silver” rating from Morningstar, the fund analyst.
A complication with investment trusts that ordinary funds avoid is that the shares can trade at a “premium” to the value of the underlying assets.
This is currently common among income-producing trusts.
Building your portfolio by choosing your own funds requires slightly more monitoring as you are relying on the decisions made by a single manager or team rather than the diverse range of expertise that you get from a “multi-manager” fund.
• Who is it suitable for? Those who want income stability and a high degree of diversification from a single fund
• Pros: Simplicity and low cost, good diversification
• Cons: Reliance on a single manager or single team
• High or low maintenance: Low
Your own basket of funds
A spread of different income-producing funds that you select yourself
The three approaches we’ve looked at so far have all involved investors buying a single fund and leaving it to the manager of that fund to choose a well diversified spread of assets.
But you can also do the job yourself. The easiest way is to pick a basket of funds of different types – in effect, you are replicating what the manager of a fund of funds does.

For a diverse range of income sources you will want some shares, probably with an international spread, plus some bonds and perhaps a little property.
“Equity income” funds aim to pick shares that pay good and growing dividends. Well regarded funds include the following: for British shares, Woodford Equity Income (which aims to yield 4pc and costs 0.75pc), River & Mercantile UK Equity Income (3.3pc, 0.89pc) and Threadneedle UK Equity Income (3.9pc, 0.82pc); for the US you could use the SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats exchange-traded fund (1.8pc, 0.35pc), which focuses on dividend growth; in Europe, Standard Life Investments European Equity Income (3.9pc, 0.9pc); for Asia the Newton Asian Income fund (4.7pc, 0.69pc); and for global exposure Aberdeen World Equity Income (3.9pc, 1.14pc).
Among bond funds, FundCalibre, the fund rating service, tips Jupiter Strategic Bond (6pc, 0.74pc) and Invesco Perpetual Monthly Income Plus (4.7pc, 0.67pc). For property it gives the thumbs up to Henderson UK Property (3.8pc, 0.85pc).
• Who is it suitable for? Investors happy to pick their own funds but not to research the stock market
• Pros: Good diversification, ease of changing portfolio
• Cons: Fund management charges, need to monitor fund performance
• High or low maintenance: Medium
Your own basket of shares and bonds
A diversified spread of high-yielding individual investments
Investors who are comfortable making their own decisions could go a step further from picking funds and choose their own shares and bonds. The advantage of this approach is that you avoid the cost of a fund manager.
As an income investor you’ll want shares that offer a decent dividend but, just as importantly, a reliable and ideally a rising dividend. Identifying high yielders is easy enough but checking that a dividend is sustainable or likely to rise is harder. For the first task, compare the dividend per share to the earning per share figure, or, even better, the cash flow per share figure (found in the accounts). Ideally earnings or cash flow should be at least double the dividend payment.
To pay a rising dividend, companies need to be increasing sales or raising profit margins by increasing prices or cutting costs. You’ll need to keep up with the business news and ideally read plenty of research, but your own observations and common sense are also great allies.
As a starting point Jeremy le Sueur of 4 Shires, the financial adviser, said BAE Systems, Chesnara and Sainsbury would all qualify as reliable income-paying shares. They yield 5.4pc, 5.4pc and 5.8pc respectively.
As for bonds, many are not available to ordinary investors, so look for those listed on the recently established “Orb” market. Be as careful choosing your bonds as your shares, looking at the strength of each company’s balance sheet and the sustainability of its profits.
Mr Le Sueur said retail bonds issued by Primary Health Care Properties, Workspace and Premier Oil were good prospects. The yields are 4.7pc, 4.8pc and 4.5pc respectively.
Kevin Doran of Brown Shipley, the wealth manager, said: "With attractive looking yields in a low interest rate environment, retail bonds most certainly have a role to play for income seeking investors, but it is important to realise that lending money to companies comes with its risks and, unlike more normal corporate bonds, retail bonds can be tricky to dispose of once the initial purchase has been made. For that reason, we would recommend performing a full credit check on the organisation and being in a position to hold the bond until maturity should the need arise."
• Who is it suitable for? Investment enthusiasts
• Pros: Low cost
• Cons: Relative lack of diversification, complete reliance on your own skill and judgment
• High or low maintenance: High
The stock-market-free zone
The other options for people who don’t trust shares
Shares, funds and bonds are not the only ways to generate an income. Here are some of the other options.
Peer to peer lending
If you put money in a bank savings account, the bank uses it to make loans to borrowers. With peer to peer lending, the bank is eliminated and you lend directly to individuals or businesses that want to borrow. P2P websites allow you to split your loans among a large number of borrowers, so you won’t lose all your money if one defaults. The largest P2P company, Zopa, pays 5.2pc interest. Zopa, which is nine years old and has lent a total of £610m, says no customer has ever lost money.
Buy to let
Some people are more comfortable with assets they can see and understand, especially residential property. Yields of 6pc are available on buy to let, although by no means everywhere. A lot of work is also involved, with many incidental costs. If you take out a mortgage, remember this effectively magnifies any capital gains or losses.
Pensioner bonds
A new savings product from next year. The bonds, to be sold by NS&I, are likely to pay better interest than current cash deposits – the Government has mentioned 4pc on a three-year bond and 2.8pc for a one-year term. The limited issue of £10bn is likely to sell out quickly. You need to be a pensioner to buy them.

Culled from the Telegraph