Friday 22 April 2016

4 Steps to Setting Up an Emergency Fund - By Christine Benz


Emergency fund
.
View photo
Thinkstock
This article is part of our “Get It Done” week on Morningstar.com: All week we will feature articles and videos offering guidance on ways to help tackle those nagging items on your financial to-do list. Find more content like this here: www.morningstar.com/goto/GetItDone
A few years ago, I met a lovely couple in their early 50s who were struggling with more than $20,000 in credit card debt. When I visited them at their home in a Chicago suburb, it was obvious that they weren’t profligate spenders; their home was modest, and they said that they hadn’t taken a real vacation in years.
Rather, their credit card problems began once their children started college. Although they were able to cover the tuition costs and typical monthly living expenses with their salaries, their monthly outlay on those two expense categories left no room for error. As a result, they began charging unexpected expenses like car repairs and veterinary care on their cards, incurring exorbitant interest fees along the way.
They were clearly troubled about having dug themselves into such a deep hole, and they were eager to do everything that they could to pay off the debt as soon as possible. We discussed various ideas for reducing their financing costs, such as transferring the debt to a home equity line of credit or borrowing from one of their 401(k) plans, both of which are preferable to high-interest credit card debt.
What I think surprised them, though, was that I didn’t suggest that they put every extra penny toward paying down their debt. Rather, I urged them to simultaneously set up an emergency savings fund. True, setting up an emergency fund would probably mean that it would take them longer to pay off all of their debt, but it would also guard against the prospect of taking on any more debt than they already had. Not only could they use their emergency fund to pay unexpected bills, but it would also provide a needed cushion should one of them lose their job.
In fact, creating a safety net in case of job loss is the key reason to set up an emergency fund. Conventional financial planning wisdom holds that you should have three to six months’ worth of household living expenses tucked away in your emergency fund, with the thought being that it would take you that long to find a new job if you should lose yours. However, I would recommend building yourself an even more generous cushion if you can swing it, preferably nine months’ to a year’s worth of living expenses. That’s particularly true if you’re highly paid or work in a highly specialized field, because it’s usually more difficult to replace such jobs. And of course, if you have any reason to believe that your job is in jeopardy—either because of problems in the economy at large or at your own company—you should also aim to build a larger emergency fund.
In addition to determining the right amount for your emergency fund, you also have to take care in selecting the investments that you put inside it. As a general rule of thumb, your emergency fund should consist of investments with maturities of less than one year, including checking and savings accounts, money market accounts, and CDs. This is money that you could need to tap in a pinch, so you want to steer clear of higher-yielding investments that could be tough to sell or that you might have to sell at a loss if you needed to get out in a hurry. Instead, you need to stick with vehicles that ensure you’ll be able to take out as much as you put in.
Here’s an overview of the types of savings and investment vehicles that are acceptable for your emergency fund:
Online savings accounts: These vehicles currently offer the most attractive yields for cash--as much as 1% or even higher in some cases. They also typically offer at least a few transactions per month. Deposits of up to $250,000 per institution will be covered by FDIC insurance. Checking and savings accounts: Convenience is the big plus here, but rates may be rock-bottom. Deposits of up to $250,000 per institution will be covered by FDIC insurance.Money market deposit accounts: These interest-bearing savings accounts typically offer a limited number of transactions per month, and deposits of as much as $250,000 per institution are FDIC-insured.Certificates of deposit: CDs are apt to have a higher yield than checking, savings, or money market accounts. They also carry FDIC insurance for deposits of as much as $250,000 per institution. The big drawback to holding CDs in your emergency fund, however, is that you’ll pay a penalty to withdraw money from a CD prematurely. So if you hold CDs as part of your emergency fund, you’ll have to weigh the higher yield against the risk of having to pay a penalty to pull money out.Money market funds: A money market mutual fund can be a good option for an emergency fund, and yields may be higher than what you’d earn on your checking, savings, or money market account. Because money funds buy very short-term bonds, they can readily swap into newer, higher-yielding securities when interest rates edge up. The big downside relative to the checking and savings accounts, CDs, and money market accounts is that money market fund assets are not FDIC-insured.If you opt for a money market fund, low costs should be your key consideration. That’s because the amount that you pay in expenses will be the key determinant of the yield that you get to pocket. (Expenses are deducted directly from yield.) You should pay no more—and preferably much less—than 0.50% in expenses for your money market fund. One other tip: If you do spy a fund with very low fees, make sure that the fund company isn’t temporarily waiving part of its expenses in an effort to attract new investors. Such waivers can readily be reversed. Also be wary of a fund with a yield that’s substantially higher than that of the competition, especially if the fund doesn’t have very low fees. It could be investing in lower-quality securities to pump up its yield and pumping up its risk level at the same time.
Also bear in mind your tax bracket when shopping for a money fund for your taxable account. Even if you’re not in the highest tax bracket, it may make sense to opt for a tax-free money market fund over a taxable one. That’s because the muni fund’s yield may actually be higher than the taxable fund’s once you factor in taxes.
Here are the key steps to take when setting up your emergency fund.
Step 1: Determine your monthly living expenses. Don’t include nonessential items that you could live without in a pinch, such as housecleaning and discretionary clothing purchases. Multiply that number by three months. This is your absolute minimum savings target for your emergency fund.
Step 2: Add up the aggregate investments that you hold in your checking and savings accounts, money market accounts and funds, and CDs. Exclude any assets that you have earmarked for other purposes, such as money that you’re saving for a car down payment or college tuition; also exclude any cash holdings in your stock or bond mutual funds. This is your current emergency fund.
Step 3: Subtract the figure from Step 2 (your current emergency fund) from the figure in Step 1 (your target emergency fund). This is how much you need to save at a bare minimum—it should be double this level or more. Setting money aside to hit this savings target should be your main savings priority in the months ahead. (If you’re also paying off high-interest credit card debt, you should try to build up your emergency fund at the same time.)
Step 4: To home in on the best investments for your emergency fund, start by looking at the yields for your current investments. Then go to www.bankrate.com to find current yields for CDs, money market deposit accounts, and money market mutual funds; compare them with what you’re earning currently. Bearing in mind the above guidelines about FDIC insurance and liquidity, also remember that it’s fine to use a combination of these vehicles rather than holding your entire emergency fund in one place. For example, you may choose to keep two months’ worth of living expenses in your checking account and the rest of your emergency fund in a higher-yielding CD or money market fund.
Next Steps
If you’re a homeowner, it can make sense to augment (but not replace) your emergency fund by setting up a home equity line of credit to use in case of emergency. That way, should you find yourself in a real bind and have to exhaust your emergency fund, you’ll have another safety net in place. Interest rates on HELOCs are usually quite low relative to other forms of financing, and the interest is tax-deductible in most situations. Set up a HELOC while you’re employed, because it’s much harder to secure this type of financing if you’re not.Although it’s not ideal to use your retirement savings as a piggy bank, your Roth IRA can help back up your emergency fund if need be. You can tap Roth IRA contributions at any time and for any reason; because of that flexibility, setting one up is a great first step when you get started in investing.Excerpted with permission of the publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. from 30-Minute Money Solutions: A Step-by-Step Guide to Managing Your Finances. Copyright (c) MMX by Morningstar, Inc.


Culled from morningstar

Thursday 21 April 2016

These Are the Highest-Paying Companies in the U.S. -By Julie Verhage


Making six figures a year is still a lot easier if you work at a technology or consulting company than it is in many other industries.
In a new report from career website Glassdoor Inc., technology and consulting firms took 24 of the 25 spots on its list of highest-paying companies in America. The only company on the list that’s not in tech or consulting is Visa, at No. 11. Last year these two fields took 13 out of 15 spots, with law firms grabbing the remaining two.
“This report reinforces that high pay continues to be tied to in-demand skills and higher education,” Andrew Chamberlain, chief economist at Glassdoor, said in the report. He added that a “war for talent” is pushing up salaries in tech and consulting.

Even companies that are struggling in the stock market continue to pay well. Despite poor performance after issuing initial public offerings, a number of former highflying startups employ some of the highest-paid workers in the U.S. And companies such as Box Inc., Twitter Inc., and LinkedIn Corp. pay their employees quite well regardless of stock slumps. Uber Technologies Inc., Airbnb Inc., and Pinterest Inc. may not have made Glassdoor’s top 25 this year, but median compensation still cracks the six-figure mark for all three businesses.
Here’s the full list from Glassdoor, including each company’s median total compensation:
View photo
.
While pay isn’t everything when it comes to workplace satisfaction, it certainly has an impact. Facebook Inc., LinkedIn, Boston Consulting Group Inc., and Alphabet Inc. all ranked highly on Glassdoor’s most recent list of best places to work. “Even if I was offered 150 percent of salary somewhere else, I would turn it down,” one LinkedIn employee wrote on Glassdoor’s website. “At LinkedIn I have had the unique opportunity to work with people that are incredibly smart, hard working, and know how to have fun while getting their work done!”

To be considered for this report, companies had to have at least 50 salary submissions from employees between March 2015 and March 2016.
Culled from Bloomberg.com

Wednesday 20 April 2016

TransferWise enters the U.S.-to-Mexico payments market-By Daniel Roberts



The international-payment platform is heading to Mexico

Yahoo Finance: Investing
The proposition of TransferWise is about as simple as it gets: “We’re focused on making it very easy, very fast and very cheap to send money internationally.” That’s how CEO Taavet Hinrikus puts it.
Of course, some people never have a reason to send money around the world. But enough people do—either to a relative living in another country, or for business purposes, or for repayments on a student loan—that TransferWise now handles $750 million per month for customers, and has sent more than $2 billion in total. Enough people are using TransferWise in the U.K., its home market, that it now has 5% market share, meaning that 5% of money sent from the U.K. to other countries is sent using TransferWise. “So what keeps us up at night is thinking, How do we grow that from 5% to 15% in the next two years, and how do we get the next bunch of countries to the 5% mark,” says Hinrikus.
To that end, TransferWise launched in Canada last week, and today launches in Mexico, which is significant beyond just incremental expansion, because U.S. to Mexico is the largest corridor for payments sent from the U.S. to another country. $25 billion is sent from the U.S. to Mexico each year, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). TransferWise will charge $3 for payments from the U.S. to Mexico under $200, and a 1.5% fee for payments over $200, whereas Western Union and banks charge an average 5% for international remittances of $200, according to World Bank Group.
As it happens, remittances from the U.S. to Mexico have become a major issue in the presidential campaign of Donald Trump. He has said that he would force Mexico to pay for his proposed border wall by blocking remittances from Mexican immigrants in the U.S.
One year ago, TransferWise was a European company only. Last year it launched in the U.S. and Australia, and this year has launched in Singapore, Japan, Canada, and now Mexico.
There’s a long runway to growth for TransferWise, but many other competitors are eyeing the same path. Xoom, TransFast, Dwolla and Venmo, to name just a few, are very different platforms but all purport to offer the same basic convenience: faster transfer times and lower transfer fees than the incumbent giants. PayPal (PYPL) owns two of those: Venmo and Xoom.
In the U.S., among tech-savvy Millennials, the best-known right now is Venmo, which lets you instantly send money to a friend from your phone, but only in the U.S. Hinrikus says TransferWise is basically Venmo for international payments. It gets compared to Venmo, but doesn’t compete with Venmo because TransferWise doesn’t allow for payments where both parties are in the U.S.—it’s only for sending money internationally. “Really the competition for us is banks-- it’s the Citibanks (C) and HSBCs (HSBC) of the world,” he says. “If you ask our customers how they used to send money to another country, it was their bank or Western Union (WU).”
Those incumbents, Hinrikus says, charge high fees for international transfers (for example, Wells Fargo takes 4.36% on payments up to $200, and 2.64% for payments over $500, Citibank takes 2.57% on any payment amount) and the recipient has to wait for a few days. TransferWise is harnessing a shift in banking behavior: the unbundling from banks, and the mobile revolution. “It used to be that you would choose your bank when you first open a bank account, when you’re 18, and you stick with that bank for the rest of your life,” says Hinrikus. “But we’re seeing now a huge wave of specialist tech companies who are biting away vertical after vertical in banking. And also, people are banking from their mobiles now.”
To help in its effort, Hinrikus and TransferWise even launched a P.R. war in Europe against bank transfer fees, complete with stunts like a recent one in London involving Parkour runners. The campaign, Stop Hidden Fees, has been picked up by the U.K.’s Conservative Party, which wants to pass a law to require more transparency from banks about fees. “We started TransferWise because we were frustrated by the behaviors of banks of hiding their fees in the exchange rates,” Hinrikus says.
Many other new fintech companies had the same motivation. And with a bubbly funding environment (TransferWise has raised nearly $100 million from big names like Richard Branson and Andreessen Horowitz), new entrants are still coming, and it is unclear which will emerge as the leader.

Culled from yahoo Finance

Tuesday 19 April 2016

Self-employed? Here’s How to Save for Retirement-By Beth Braverman



Self-employed? Here’s How to Save for Retirement
.
View photo
Self-employed? Here’s How to Save for Retirement
Working for yourself comes with lots of perks: setting your own hours, your own dress code and your own workload. That’s probably part of the reason nearly a quarter of workers freelance, either full- or part-time. They make good money, too. Almost half earn six figures.

The downside is making up for all the benefits that employers typically provide. That means figuring out health care coverage (which at least is now easier — if not cheaper — than it was before Obamacare) and setting up retirement accounts.
“When you have a workplace 401(k), a lot of the heavy lifting for retirement planning is already done for you,” says Christine Benz, director of personal finance at Morningstar. “That makes it easier to overcome some of the barriers around getting started with retirement planning.”
Related: 13 Tax Tips for Self-Employed Workers in 2016
That’s not the case for self-employed workers. More than three out of 10 freelancers said they were anxious about saving money for retirement, and more than half reported being behind, according to a November study by TD Ameritrade. By contrast, Americans with access to a workplace retirement plan were more than twice as likely to be very confident about having enough money to retire, according to a separate study by the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
The good news is that saving for retirement is not impossible when you’re working on your own, though it may require more effort. Here’s what you need to know:
You’ll need to put away even more. Financialadvisers recommend that savers stash away at least 15 percent of their income for retirement, including their own money as well as any employer match. Freelancers have to sock away even more income to make up for not getting an employer match. That’s on top of building an emergency fund with at least six months’ worth of expenses that can help weather a dry spell.
It’s important for freelancers to factor the cost of those savings into their business budget, says Randi Merel, a financial advisor for Merrill Lynch. “You have to make sure that you’re earning enough money to cover your benefits,” she says.
Related: This Is Why Freelancing Is the Hot Work Trend

You’ve got several options.
There are several ways freelancers can save money for retirement. Here are three to consider:
1) A traditional or Roth IRA: If you already have one of these accounts and aren’t making a ton of money, you can just continue putting aside retirement income there. With a traditional IRA, any withdrawals will be taxed, but you can deduct your contributions.
With a Roth (you’re eligible if your income is less than $120,000), you pay taxes now on your contributions, but the money grows tax-free. You also can make tax-free withdrawals on the principal, so it can double as an emergency fund for new freelancers, although you’ll want to keep the investments fairly conservative. “Then when you start taking on more projects and making more money, you can have a dedicated retirement fund,” says Randall Greene, CEO of Greene Financial Management in Altadena, Calif.
Annual contribution limits for both accounts are $5,500 for younger savers and $6,500 for those over 65.
2) SEP IRA: The most common plan for freelancers and sole proprietors, SEP IRAs allow contributions up to about 20 percent of your compensation, or $53,000, that grow tax-free.  There’s a complex formula to determine your contribution based on your compensation as a self-employed person. Use this calculator to find the exact amount.
Related: Here’s Who Is Winning in the Gig Economy
A nice benefit of SEP IRAs is that the deadline for contributions is either Tax Day or when you file your taxes. So, you could put away just 5 percent of your income all year, but decide in February to put another 20 percent in because you find that you have the extra income. That can help you make up for any leaner years when you couldn’t contribute as much. (The same benefit applies to IRAs and Roths, but at much lower limits.)
You can set up a SEP IRA with almost any bank or brokerage, and fees tend to be minimal. “It’s a very cost-effective option,” says Douglas Boneparth, a financial advisor and partner with Longwave Financial.
3) Solo 401(k): Also known as an individual 401(k), these accounts let you put away $18,000 as an employee. Additionally you can contribute about 20 percent of your compensation (again, use the above calculator to determine the exact amount) or $53,000, whichever is less, as your own boss. Those over age 50 can put in an extra $6,000, and spouses who work together can both put in $53,000.
A Solo 401(k) may cost more to set up and require additional paperwork at tax time, but its assets are protected from creditors under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Contributions must be made before the end of the calendar year.
Many Solo 401(k)s also offer the option to borrow against your retirement savings, although experts say that doing so is rarely the best financial move.
Skip automation. Most retirement accounts offer an auto-fund option allowing you to set aside a predetermined amount of money each month. That can be more difficult for freelancers, since your income fluctuates. Instead, consider making contributions a few times a year, recommends Gage DeYoung, a certified financial planner and founder of Prudent Wealthcare in Aurora, Colorado. “Plan on doing it at the same time that you pay your estimated quarterly taxes,” he says.
Plan to work longer. Since freelancers control their schedules and how much work they take on, they’re ideally situated to ease into retirement. If you plan to continue working (even if you’ve scaled back) to delay drawing down your retirement funds, then you can retire more securely on a relatively smaller nest egg.
Culled from The Fiscal Times

Monday 18 April 2016

Chase's mysterious '5/24' rule has infuriated airline mile churners-By Mandi Woodruff



It just got so much tougher to churn and burn credit cards

JPMorgan profit falls 8 percent, fails key regulatory test
.
View photo
FILE - In this Jan. 14, 2015, file photo, people walk past a branch of Chase Bank, in New York. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) on Wednesday, April 13, 2016, reported first-quarter earnings. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)
This could be the end for Chase (JPM) credit card mile churners.
The bank has reportedly adopted a new rule that makes it much harder for credit card churners to cash in on multiple sign-up bonuses.
In case you need a refresher — card (or mile) “churning” is the art of rapidly signing up for rewards credit cards, spending just enough to earn the signup bonus, and then canceling the card before you get hit with the annual fee. Card churners take their bonus points and miles and use them to score free hotel stays and airfare and other perks. There are dozens of blogs, message boards and Reddit threads dedicated to mile churning, where devoted churners swap tips and best practices.
Lately, these churners have been grumbling about Chase’s new so-called 5/24 Rule, which the issuer reportedly established to prevent this kind of churn-and-burn activity. If applicants have opened more than five new lines of credit in the last 24 months, Chase underwriters are more likely to deny their application for a new Chase credit card — even if they’ve got stellar credit.
Zach Honig, editor-in-chief of The Points Guy, a popular blog for mile churners, said he was denied twice this month for a Chase Freedom Unlimited card, despite having an above-average 806 FICO score. After the first notice saying he was denied, Honig called to ask for another shot. A representative told him he was denied because he had too many recently opened credit cards — 17 in the last two years, he told Yahoo Finance. Seventeen sounds like a lot but it’s not out of the ordinary for mile churners, who commonly apply for several new cards every few months.
It’s widely known that opening many lines of credit in a short period of time can ding your credit score. By applying for only a few cards every few months, mile churners say it gives their score plenty of time to bounce back before their next round of applications.
NYSEFri, Apr 15, 2016 8:00 PM EDT
Still, it’s not clear from Honig’s experience and anecdotal reports from other travelers whether five recent accounts is the magic number that will trigger a denial from Chase. Another blogger said he was denied a Chase Sapphire Preferred card in February. It would have been his seventh new credit card in 24 months. Travel blogger Angelina Aucello said she successfully applied for the Chase Freedom Unlimited rewards card, despite having recently opened six new credit cards.
Chase spokesperson Ashley Dodd told Yahoo Finance said she could not confirm that the 5/24 rule exists but did say having too many new credit accounts doesn't look great. “To continue providing valuable offers that attract those types of customers, we have restrictions related to the number of new cards customers can receive in a period of time,” she said.
Chase hasn’t been shy about another rule that makes it tougher to churn and burn. Applicants who have opened a Chase credit card within the last 24 months and received a signup bonus will not be eligible for that bonus again. Chase isn’t the first bank to adjust its policies to thwart churners. American Express (AXP) has an even tougher rule for repeat customers. New credit card applicants no longer qualify for signup bonuses if they owned the same credit card at any point in the past. The fine print for the Capital One Venture Rewards Card also says previous cardholders may not qualify for their current 40,000-point bonus offer.
Rules like these, which are becoming increasingly popular, are a big deterrent to card churners. It’s common practice for churners to apply for a card they’ve already owned and canceled if the issuer is running a new bonus offer. With a rule like this, the days of stacking bonuses with the same card are pretty much over if other credit card issuers follow suit.
It’s not hard to see why Chase and others would want to protect themselves. The Chase Sapphire Preferred Card is one of most popular rewards cards on the market, offering a lucrative sign up bonus of 50,000 points that can be redeemed for up to $625 in airfare or hotel costs. The card comes with an annual fee of $95. If too many churners take advantage of the offer, all they’re doing is giving away cash and not making any profit.
The carrot and the stick
It's a delicate balancing act. Banks need to find ways to make it more difficult for churners to ditch them while still dangling a sweet enough carrot — in the form of signup bonuses — to lure in new customers.
“Credit card churn is a serious cost issue for banks because so much effort is spent up front to open a new account, only to see the customer leave when the sign-up bonus has been awarded and redeemed," says Michael Moeser, director of payments for research firm Javelin.
He points to Bank of America (BAC), which is trying out a unique way to attract customers and keep them. They offer 10% more bonus points if cardmembers also have an active checking or savings account with the bank.
"While I would prefer to see banks use more of the carrot approach to mitigating churn, I expect to see both 'Carrot and Stick' being rolled out in the next few years," Moesner says.
Mile churners are in the minority of credit users. It takes a lot of upkeep to juggle so many credit card accounts and with the average credit score of mid 600s in America today, not many people have healthy enough credit to qualify for so many lines of credit. Credit Karma, which has over 50 million users nationwide, looked at their data for Yahoo Finance. Of members who have logged in recently to check their credit reports, only about 4% opened five or more lines of credit in the last two years.
"It's important to remember that most people are not applying for five credit cards in less than two years, so largely, people will be unaffected by these changes," says Bethy Hardeman, chief consumer advocate for Credit Karma. 
 
Culled from Yahoo