NEWS PENSIONS FINANCE TECHNOLOGY MONEY & BANKING ECONOMY PUBLIC MANAGEMENT MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT CAREERS INSPIRATION AND CONSULTING.
Saturday, 6 June 2015
Why toddlers need savings accounts as much as millennials-By Natalie Kitroeff
Millennials who had experience with savings accounts are more likely than people with just a financial education to have money at the ready for emergency expenses, and they were less likely to rely on high-cost loans or have excessive debt, according to research from the University of Kansas. The findings suggest that parents could spend more time encouraging their children to use financial concepts in practice, not just learn them, says Terri Friedline, one of the report’s authors.
“The opportunity to put your knowledge into practice by having a financial product may help to move the needle in terms of financial outcomes,” Friedline says, adding that research suggests kids as young as five years old can start learning about savings. "They can learn and grasp financial concepts."
For the analysis, researchers looked at how nearly 7,000 people ages 18-34 responded to a set of financial questions in a 2012 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority survey. The researchers categorized people based on whether they took personal finance classes in college, in high school, or at work, and whether they lived in households with a savings account. The study's analysts also controlled for a range of factors that might make someone more or less prone to financial problems, such as income, education level, and employment status.
People with a savings account and financial education were significantly more likely to have $2,000 set aside for emergencies than people who had only a financial education. Having both an education and practical saving experience also made young people less prone to taking out risky debt, such as payday loans. Just 41 percent of people with both an education and a savings account used these "alternative financial services," which are known for leaving consumers buried in mounds of intractable debt. More than half of people who just had a financial education used those services.
Indeed, people with savings accounts who took finance classes were significantly less likely to say they carried too much debt than those with just an education.
Culled from Bloomberg.com
Friday, 5 June 2015
Best states for retirement 2015-By Stacy Rapacon
The very best place to retire for you might be on a
beach...or in the mountains...or near family...or in the same house
you've lived in for years. It's a personal decision that no one else can
make for you. However, if you haven't already settled on a retirement
destination, an objective analysis of your options can help narrow your
search.
We rated all 50 states and the District of Columbia based on quantifiable factors that are important to many retirees. Our rankings favored states that are affordable and economically healthy, as well as those with low crime rates. We also rewarded states with large but relatively prosperous populations of residents age 65 and up (though if you prefer a younger crowd, consider a college town for retirement). Finally, we weighed the tax situation for retirees in each state.
The following 10 states topped our rankings of retirement destinations. No state is perfect, but within each we identified a city or two that should hold particular appeal to retirees. Take a look. Our picks span the country from east to (far) west and offer a wide diversity of climates and lifestyles. There's a place for just about everyone.
10. Wyoming
Total population: 570,134 Share of population 65+: 12.7% (U.S.: 13.4%)
Cost of living: 6.4% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $40,197 (U.S.: $48,665)
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
The Cowboy State is a particularly good destination for retirees looking to connect with nature. Wyoming's unique landscape includes Yellowstone National Park, the Grand Teton mountain range and Snake River. Plus, you can keep a nice slice of earth all to yourself: Wyoming has the smallest population of any state in the country, with just six residents per square mile.
If you'd prefer some company, Cheyenne is Wyoming's most populous city and home to the state's largest hospital. It ranks ninth for successful aging among 252 small metro areas, according to the Milken Institute, an economic think tank that credits the capital city's high ranking to its economic strength. In fact, the entire state has the third-lowest poverty rate in the U.S. among people age 65 and older (behind Alaska and New Hampshire). Wyoming is also one of Kiplinger's 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees.
SEE ALSO: 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees
9. Kansas
Total population: 2.9 million Share of population 65+: 13.5%
Cost of living: 1.8% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $44,165
Retiree tax picture: Friendly
For some retirees, there's no place like Kansas. The Sunflower State offers affordable housing and health care for the 65-and-older population. The median home value for this age group is $110,900 in Kansas, compared with the U.S. median of $164,400. And lifetime health care costs for a healthy 65-year-old couple retiring this year (and covered by Medicare parts B and D and a supplemental insurance policy) are expected to run about 5% less in Kansas than the U.S. average, according to research firm HealthView Services.
Topeka is particularly affordable, with overall costs for retirees coming in 6.4% below the national average. No wonder the capital city is popular with people age 65 and older, who account for 14.8% of its population. Plus, Lawrence, home to the University of Kansas's main campus, is less than 30 miles away, close enough to take advantage of the amenities of college life. The university's Osher Lifelong Learning Institute offers low-cost classes and special events designed for students age 50 and older. Also, KU's Landon Center on Aging houses clinical and research facilities focused on the treatment of older adults.
SEE ALSO: 10 Least Tax-Friendly States for Retirees
8. Iowa
Total population: 3.1 million Share of population 65+: 15.1%
Cost of living: 0.2% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $37,468
Retiree tax picture: Not Friendly
There are retirement destinations of all sizes to choose from in Iowa. For those looking to live in a big city on a small budget, Des Moines is a good choice thanks to living costs for retirees that fall 9.6% below average. Affordability is just one reason the Milken Institute ranked the state capital seventh out of 100 large U.S. metro areas for successful aging. Des Moines also boasts a strong economy, numerous museums and arts venues, and plenty of health care facilities specializing in aging-related services. For similar reasons, the Milken Institute ranks Iowa City first among small metro areas for successful aging. In addition, AARP named Cedar Rapids one of the 10 most livable midsize cities in the U.S. for people age 50+; nearby Marion made AARP's top 10 for livability among small cities.
As such, it should come as no surprise that older residents account for an above-average portion of Iowa's population, and an overwhelming majority of them are economically secure. The state's poverty rate for people 65 and older is 7.4%, compared with 9.4% for the U.S. Iowa's affordability surely helps. The state's overall cost of living is on par with the nation's, and housing and health care costs are well below average. Although the state is the least tax-friendly toward retirees among our top 10, Iowa did recently phase out state income tax on Social Security benefits.
SEE ALSO: 9 Worst Social Security Mistakes
7. Hawaii
Total population: 1.4 million Share of population 65+: 14.8%
Cost of living: 33.4% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $66,288
Retiree tax picture: Mixed
Let's get this out of the way: Hawaii is expensive. But for retirees who can afford it, it's a paradise that can be worth every penny--and it's not necessarily out of reach. As a whole, retirement-age residents of the Aloha State aren't financially strapped. The average household income for Hawaii's 65+ population is the highest of any of the 50 states. And the poverty rate for the same age group is 7.4%, well below the national 9.4% rate.
Housing can eat up a big chunk of a nest egg. Hawaii's median home price for residents 65 and up is the highest in the country at $541,600, more than three times the national median. And state capital and tourist hub Honolulu, on the island of Oahu, is one of the most expensive U.S. cities to live in. Retirees will get more bang for the buck on the island of Hawaii, also known as the Big Island, where the median home value for 65+ residents is a more reasonable $304,500 and rental costs are about on par with the rest of the nation. Areas to consider on the Big Island include Kona, Waimea and Hilo. And no matter where they live in Hawaii, retirees can at least save on some taxes: Social Security benefits and most other pension payouts are exempt from state income taxes.
SEE ALSO: 11 Common Medicare Mistakes
6. Arizona
Total population: 6.5 million Share of population 65+: 14.4%
Cost of living: 6.2% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $43,628
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
The Grand Canyon State, with its ample sunshine and beautiful desert landscape, is a popular retirement destination. Prescott, located 100 miles north of Phoenix, has a particularly abundant population of 65-and-older residents, who make up a whopping 24.3% of the metro area's total. And while the state has slightly above-average living costs, Prescott is one of our Cheapest Places Where You'll Want to Retire. Its retirees tend to spend 2.1% less than average on living expenses. Younger retirees might consider Peoria, a suburb of Phoenix that rates as one of our Best Cities for Early Retirement.
Retired residents throughout the state can also save on taxes. Arizona is one of Kiplinger's 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees. The state exempts Social Security benefits from taxes, as well as a portion of some other types of retirement income. Plus, you won't face an inheritance or estate tax.
SEE ALSO: 9 Reasons Women Will Never Retire
5. South Dakota
Total population: 825,198 Share of population 65+: 14.5%
Cost of living: 0.1% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $37,102
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
Safety and affordability are two good reasons to retire to South Dakota. Crimes occur at much lower rates in the state than they do across the country. The median home value for residents age 65 and older is just $111,300, about one-third less than the U.S. median. And lifetime health care costs for an average, healthy 65-year-old couple in South Dakota are expected to total nearly $25,000 less than the national average. A favorable tax environment with no state income tax adds to the attractiveness.
Both Sioux Falls and Rapid City rank among the five best small metro areas for successful aging, according to the Milken Institute, coming in second and fifth, respectively. The cost of living for retired people in the former is a bit better, at 1.9% below average, while it's just below average in the latter. Young retirees may be particularly happy in Sioux Falls with its large population of 45- to 64-year-olds. AARP named Sioux Falls one of the 10 most livable midsize cities in the U.S. for people age 50+, citing the 25-mile walking and biking trail that loops the city. And you'll be sure to lure the grandkids for a visit with the promise of a day trip to the Mount Rushmore State's famous memorial.
SEE ALSO: Cheapest Places You Will Want to Retire
4. Pennsylvania
Total population: 12.7 million Share of population 65+: 15.8%
Cost of living: 14.8% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $43,356
Retiree tax picture: Friendly
Economic stability holds the poverty rate of older residents of the Keystone State down to 8.3%, compared with 9.4% for the U.S. And crime rates are safely below average. Though the overall cost of living is above average, housing for people 65+ is reasonably priced. The median home value is $149,300 for this age group, or $15,100 below average. Plus, Pennsylvania's tax laws help offset some costs for retirees: Social Security benefits and payouts from 401(k)s, IRAs, deferred-compensation plans and other retirement accounts are all tax-exempt.
Retirees on a budget will like Pittsburgh. Rated as one of our Cheapest Places Where You'll Want to Retire, the metro area's cost of living for retired people falls 3.7% below the U.S. average. And don't let the city's Rust Belt reputation fool you. Enjoy cultural attractions such as the Andy Warhol Museum and the Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre, a vibrant jazz scene, as well as all the offerings of local universities including Duquesne, Carnegie Mellon and Pitt. State College, home to Penn State, is another great university town in Pennsylvania to consider for retirement. But if your heart is set on a major East Coast city, opt for Philadelphia. AARP named it one of the 10 most livable big cities in the U.S. for people age 50+, highlighting the free (or reduced) transit fares for residents 65 and over.
SEE ALSO: Great College Towns to Retire To
3. West Virgina
Total population: 1.9 million Share of population 65+: 16.5%
Cost of living: 2.0% below the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $37,788
Retiree tax picture: Friendly
Why retire to the Mountain State? John Denver said it best. For retirees hoping to explore the outdoors, West Virginia is almost heaven with its Blue Ridge Mountains and Shenandoah River. If that's not enough to get you singing "take me home," perhaps the low cost of living can entice you. For homeowners age 65 and older, the median home value is just $91,400, tied with Mississippi for the lowest in the nation. Rental costs are also rock-bottom for retirees.
Morgantown offers a downtown Main Street to take you off the country roads and give you a small taste of city living. You can enjoy an array of restaurants and pubs, art galleries, and boutique shops. Home to West Virginia University, Morgantown offers residents the opportunity to take in all the concerts, theater performances and sporting events hosted by the school. Plus, the college town provides an excellent health care system and low hospital costs, according to the Milken Institute.
SEE ALSO: Great Places to Retire Overseas
2. Florida
Total population: 19.1 million Share of population 65+: 17.8%
Cost of living: 4.6% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $45,144
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
Nearly 3.4 million older residents can't be wrong. Florida is famous for its retiree-haven status and boasts a population with the greatest abundance of people age 65 and up in the country. The warm weather and beautiful beaches may not hurt the state's appeal to people of a certain age, but the tax picture is surely the main attraction. Florida has no state income tax, estate tax or inheritance tax, and it doesn't tax Social Security or other retirement income.
The Sunshine State may be an obvious retirement destination, but picking where to retire within Florida will prove more difficult. The state is packed with good, affordable options, including Fort Myers, Sarasota and Tampa along the Gulf and Vero Beach on the Atlantic side. And Gainesville is a great college town for retirement. But Punta Gorda tops our rankings for Cheapest Places Where You'll Want to Retire. The share of Punta Gorda's population age 65+ is a robust 34.5%, and the cost of living is 3.8% below average for retired people.
TOOL: Retirement Savings Calculator
1. Delaware
Total population: 908,446 Share of population 65+: 14.9%
Cost of living: 6.4% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $47,860
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
The First State is tops for retirees. Delaware's population includes a great number of residents who are 65+, and the retired set can enjoy a life unburdened by heavy taxes. One of Kiplinger's 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees, Delaware levies no sales tax and modest income taxes, from which Social Security benefits are exempt. Plus, it's relatively affordable compared with nearby New Jersey (with living costs 21.4% above the national average), Connecticut (33.4% above average) and New York (52.7% above average), one of our worst states for retirement.
Oceanside cities such as Bethany, Dewey and Rehoboth may be attractive, but they come with living costs between 49.4% and 81.9% above the national average. A more affordable choice: Milford. The small inland city is less than an hour north of the popular beach towns and has living costs just 5.2% above average, according to Sperling's Best Places. With a population of about 10,000 people, Milford straddles the Mispillion River. Along with the river walk and park, you can find numerous restaurants, boutiques and festivals in the downtown area. It's also just about an hour south of Wilmington, the state's largest city, and all its amenities, ranging from museums and galleries to gambling and wineries. Regular Amtrak service via Wilmington can get you to New York or Washington in less than two hours and to Philadelphia in less than half an hour.
But you can stay in town for quality health care. Bayhealth Milford Memorial offers an array of inpatient and outpatient services, ranging from a cancer center to a joint-replacement facility.
Culled from Kiplinger:
We rated all 50 states and the District of Columbia based on quantifiable factors that are important to many retirees. Our rankings favored states that are affordable and economically healthy, as well as those with low crime rates. We also rewarded states with large but relatively prosperous populations of residents age 65 and up (though if you prefer a younger crowd, consider a college town for retirement). Finally, we weighed the tax situation for retirees in each state.
The following 10 states topped our rankings of retirement destinations. No state is perfect, but within each we identified a city or two that should hold particular appeal to retirees. Take a look. Our picks span the country from east to (far) west and offer a wide diversity of climates and lifestyles. There's a place for just about everyone.
10. Wyoming
Total population: 570,134 Share of population 65+: 12.7% (U.S.: 13.4%)
Cost of living: 6.4% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $40,197 (U.S.: $48,665)
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
The Cowboy State is a particularly good destination for retirees looking to connect with nature. Wyoming's unique landscape includes Yellowstone National Park, the Grand Teton mountain range and Snake River. Plus, you can keep a nice slice of earth all to yourself: Wyoming has the smallest population of any state in the country, with just six residents per square mile.
If you'd prefer some company, Cheyenne is Wyoming's most populous city and home to the state's largest hospital. It ranks ninth for successful aging among 252 small metro areas, according to the Milken Institute, an economic think tank that credits the capital city's high ranking to its economic strength. In fact, the entire state has the third-lowest poverty rate in the U.S. among people age 65 and older (behind Alaska and New Hampshire). Wyoming is also one of Kiplinger's 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees.
SEE ALSO: 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees
9. Kansas
Total population: 2.9 million Share of population 65+: 13.5%
Cost of living: 1.8% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $44,165
Retiree tax picture: Friendly
For some retirees, there's no place like Kansas. The Sunflower State offers affordable housing and health care for the 65-and-older population. The median home value for this age group is $110,900 in Kansas, compared with the U.S. median of $164,400. And lifetime health care costs for a healthy 65-year-old couple retiring this year (and covered by Medicare parts B and D and a supplemental insurance policy) are expected to run about 5% less in Kansas than the U.S. average, according to research firm HealthView Services.
Topeka is particularly affordable, with overall costs for retirees coming in 6.4% below the national average. No wonder the capital city is popular with people age 65 and older, who account for 14.8% of its population. Plus, Lawrence, home to the University of Kansas's main campus, is less than 30 miles away, close enough to take advantage of the amenities of college life. The university's Osher Lifelong Learning Institute offers low-cost classes and special events designed for students age 50 and older. Also, KU's Landon Center on Aging houses clinical and research facilities focused on the treatment of older adults.
SEE ALSO: 10 Least Tax-Friendly States for Retirees
8. Iowa
Total population: 3.1 million Share of population 65+: 15.1%
Cost of living: 0.2% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $37,468
Retiree tax picture: Not Friendly
There are retirement destinations of all sizes to choose from in Iowa. For those looking to live in a big city on a small budget, Des Moines is a good choice thanks to living costs for retirees that fall 9.6% below average. Affordability is just one reason the Milken Institute ranked the state capital seventh out of 100 large U.S. metro areas for successful aging. Des Moines also boasts a strong economy, numerous museums and arts venues, and plenty of health care facilities specializing in aging-related services. For similar reasons, the Milken Institute ranks Iowa City first among small metro areas for successful aging. In addition, AARP named Cedar Rapids one of the 10 most livable midsize cities in the U.S. for people age 50+; nearby Marion made AARP's top 10 for livability among small cities.
As such, it should come as no surprise that older residents account for an above-average portion of Iowa's population, and an overwhelming majority of them are economically secure. The state's poverty rate for people 65 and older is 7.4%, compared with 9.4% for the U.S. Iowa's affordability surely helps. The state's overall cost of living is on par with the nation's, and housing and health care costs are well below average. Although the state is the least tax-friendly toward retirees among our top 10, Iowa did recently phase out state income tax on Social Security benefits.
SEE ALSO: 9 Worst Social Security Mistakes
7. Hawaii
Total population: 1.4 million Share of population 65+: 14.8%
Cost of living: 33.4% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $66,288
Retiree tax picture: Mixed
Let's get this out of the way: Hawaii is expensive. But for retirees who can afford it, it's a paradise that can be worth every penny--and it's not necessarily out of reach. As a whole, retirement-age residents of the Aloha State aren't financially strapped. The average household income for Hawaii's 65+ population is the highest of any of the 50 states. And the poverty rate for the same age group is 7.4%, well below the national 9.4% rate.
Housing can eat up a big chunk of a nest egg. Hawaii's median home price for residents 65 and up is the highest in the country at $541,600, more than three times the national median. And state capital and tourist hub Honolulu, on the island of Oahu, is one of the most expensive U.S. cities to live in. Retirees will get more bang for the buck on the island of Hawaii, also known as the Big Island, where the median home value for 65+ residents is a more reasonable $304,500 and rental costs are about on par with the rest of the nation. Areas to consider on the Big Island include Kona, Waimea and Hilo. And no matter where they live in Hawaii, retirees can at least save on some taxes: Social Security benefits and most other pension payouts are exempt from state income taxes.
SEE ALSO: 11 Common Medicare Mistakes
6. Arizona
Total population: 6.5 million Share of population 65+: 14.4%
Cost of living: 6.2% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $43,628
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
The Grand Canyon State, with its ample sunshine and beautiful desert landscape, is a popular retirement destination. Prescott, located 100 miles north of Phoenix, has a particularly abundant population of 65-and-older residents, who make up a whopping 24.3% of the metro area's total. And while the state has slightly above-average living costs, Prescott is one of our Cheapest Places Where You'll Want to Retire. Its retirees tend to spend 2.1% less than average on living expenses. Younger retirees might consider Peoria, a suburb of Phoenix that rates as one of our Best Cities for Early Retirement.
Retired residents throughout the state can also save on taxes. Arizona is one of Kiplinger's 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees. The state exempts Social Security benefits from taxes, as well as a portion of some other types of retirement income. Plus, you won't face an inheritance or estate tax.
SEE ALSO: 9 Reasons Women Will Never Retire
5. South Dakota
Total population: 825,198 Share of population 65+: 14.5%
Cost of living: 0.1% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $37,102
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
Safety and affordability are two good reasons to retire to South Dakota. Crimes occur at much lower rates in the state than they do across the country. The median home value for residents age 65 and older is just $111,300, about one-third less than the U.S. median. And lifetime health care costs for an average, healthy 65-year-old couple in South Dakota are expected to total nearly $25,000 less than the national average. A favorable tax environment with no state income tax adds to the attractiveness.
Both Sioux Falls and Rapid City rank among the five best small metro areas for successful aging, according to the Milken Institute, coming in second and fifth, respectively. The cost of living for retired people in the former is a bit better, at 1.9% below average, while it's just below average in the latter. Young retirees may be particularly happy in Sioux Falls with its large population of 45- to 64-year-olds. AARP named Sioux Falls one of the 10 most livable midsize cities in the U.S. for people age 50+, citing the 25-mile walking and biking trail that loops the city. And you'll be sure to lure the grandkids for a visit with the promise of a day trip to the Mount Rushmore State's famous memorial.
SEE ALSO: Cheapest Places You Will Want to Retire
4. Pennsylvania
Total population: 12.7 million Share of population 65+: 15.8%
Cost of living: 14.8% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $43,356
Retiree tax picture: Friendly
Economic stability holds the poverty rate of older residents of the Keystone State down to 8.3%, compared with 9.4% for the U.S. And crime rates are safely below average. Though the overall cost of living is above average, housing for people 65+ is reasonably priced. The median home value is $149,300 for this age group, or $15,100 below average. Plus, Pennsylvania's tax laws help offset some costs for retirees: Social Security benefits and payouts from 401(k)s, IRAs, deferred-compensation plans and other retirement accounts are all tax-exempt.
Retirees on a budget will like Pittsburgh. Rated as one of our Cheapest Places Where You'll Want to Retire, the metro area's cost of living for retired people falls 3.7% below the U.S. average. And don't let the city's Rust Belt reputation fool you. Enjoy cultural attractions such as the Andy Warhol Museum and the Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre, a vibrant jazz scene, as well as all the offerings of local universities including Duquesne, Carnegie Mellon and Pitt. State College, home to Penn State, is another great university town in Pennsylvania to consider for retirement. But if your heart is set on a major East Coast city, opt for Philadelphia. AARP named it one of the 10 most livable big cities in the U.S. for people age 50+, highlighting the free (or reduced) transit fares for residents 65 and over.
SEE ALSO: Great College Towns to Retire To
3. West Virgina
Total population: 1.9 million Share of population 65+: 16.5%
Cost of living: 2.0% below the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $37,788
Retiree tax picture: Friendly
Why retire to the Mountain State? John Denver said it best. For retirees hoping to explore the outdoors, West Virginia is almost heaven with its Blue Ridge Mountains and Shenandoah River. If that's not enough to get you singing "take me home," perhaps the low cost of living can entice you. For homeowners age 65 and older, the median home value is just $91,400, tied with Mississippi for the lowest in the nation. Rental costs are also rock-bottom for retirees.
Morgantown offers a downtown Main Street to take you off the country roads and give you a small taste of city living. You can enjoy an array of restaurants and pubs, art galleries, and boutique shops. Home to West Virginia University, Morgantown offers residents the opportunity to take in all the concerts, theater performances and sporting events hosted by the school. Plus, the college town provides an excellent health care system and low hospital costs, according to the Milken Institute.
SEE ALSO: Great Places to Retire Overseas
2. Florida
Total population: 19.1 million Share of population 65+: 17.8%
Cost of living: 4.6% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $45,144
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
Nearly 3.4 million older residents can't be wrong. Florida is famous for its retiree-haven status and boasts a population with the greatest abundance of people age 65 and up in the country. The warm weather and beautiful beaches may not hurt the state's appeal to people of a certain age, but the tax picture is surely the main attraction. Florida has no state income tax, estate tax or inheritance tax, and it doesn't tax Social Security or other retirement income.
The Sunshine State may be an obvious retirement destination, but picking where to retire within Florida will prove more difficult. The state is packed with good, affordable options, including Fort Myers, Sarasota and Tampa along the Gulf and Vero Beach on the Atlantic side. And Gainesville is a great college town for retirement. But Punta Gorda tops our rankings for Cheapest Places Where You'll Want to Retire. The share of Punta Gorda's population age 65+ is a robust 34.5%, and the cost of living is 3.8% below average for retired people.
TOOL: Retirement Savings Calculator
1. Delaware
Total population: 908,446 Share of population 65+: 14.9%
Cost of living: 6.4% above the U.S. average
Average income for 65+ households: $47,860
Retiree tax picture: Most Friendly
The First State is tops for retirees. Delaware's population includes a great number of residents who are 65+, and the retired set can enjoy a life unburdened by heavy taxes. One of Kiplinger's 10 Most Tax-Friendly States for Retirees, Delaware levies no sales tax and modest income taxes, from which Social Security benefits are exempt. Plus, it's relatively affordable compared with nearby New Jersey (with living costs 21.4% above the national average), Connecticut (33.4% above average) and New York (52.7% above average), one of our worst states for retirement.
Oceanside cities such as Bethany, Dewey and Rehoboth may be attractive, but they come with living costs between 49.4% and 81.9% above the national average. A more affordable choice: Milford. The small inland city is less than an hour north of the popular beach towns and has living costs just 5.2% above average, according to Sperling's Best Places. With a population of about 10,000 people, Milford straddles the Mispillion River. Along with the river walk and park, you can find numerous restaurants, boutiques and festivals in the downtown area. It's also just about an hour south of Wilmington, the state's largest city, and all its amenities, ranging from museums and galleries to gambling and wineries. Regular Amtrak service via Wilmington can get you to New York or Washington in less than two hours and to Philadelphia in less than half an hour.
But you can stay in town for quality health care. Bayhealth Milford Memorial offers an array of inpatient and outpatient services, ranging from a cancer center to a joint-replacement facility.
Culled from Kiplinger:
Thursday, 4 June 2015
FBI extends FIFA scrutiny to World Cup host bids of Russia, Qatar-By Mark Hosenball and Katharina Bart
By Mark Hosenball and Katharina Bart
.
NEW YORK/ZURICH (Reuters) - The FBI's investigation of bribery and
corruption at FIFA includes scrutiny of how soccer's governing body
awarded World Cup hosting rights to Russia and Qatar, a U.S. law
enforcement official said.
Russia and Qatar have
denied wrongdoing in the conduct of their bids for the 2018 and 2022
tournaments, which were not the subject of charges announced by U.S.
prosecutors a week ago against FIFA officials that stunned world soccer.The U.S. law enforcement official, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said the review of the bids would be part of a probe that goes beyond the indictments. Among issues the FBI is examining is the stewardship of FIFA by longtime president Sepp Blatter, who unexpectedly announced on Tuesday he was resigning shortly before it emerged that he too was under investigation by U.S. law enforcement.
Authorities said last week they were investigating a case of $150 million paid in bribes over two decades, while Swiss prosecutors announced their own criminal inquiry into the 2018 and 2022 bids.
On Wednesday, the partially blacked out transcript of the November 2013 guilty plea of Chuck Blazer, a U.S. citizen and FIFA executive committee member from 1997 to 2013, showed he and others in FIFA agreed to accept bribes in bidding for the 1998 and 2010 World Cups and other tournaments.
"Among other things, I agreed with other persons in or around 1992 to facilitate the acceptance of a bribe in conjunction with the selection of the host nation for the 1998 World Cup," Blazer told a federal judge in New York, according to the transcript.
The tournament was hosted by France, but separate court documents contain the prosecutors' allegation that bidding nation Morocco paid a bribe to another FIFA executive, Jack Warner of Trinidad and Tobago, and that Blazer acted as intermediary. Warner has denied this and other charges against him, and late on Wednesday aired a paid political statement saying he feared for his life, but would tell investigators all he knows about corruption at FIFA.
Blazer went on to say in his plea hearing that from 2004 and through 2011 "I and others on the FIFA executive committee agreed to accept bribes in conjunction with the selection of South Africa as the host nation for the 2010 World Cup."
Blazer's lawyer declined to comment on Wednesday.
Many of the details were previously revealed in charging documents released by prosecutors when they announced indictments for 14 people, including nine FIFA officials.
View gallery
FIFA President Sepp Blatter FIFA arrives for a news conference at the FIFA headquarters in Zurich, S …
Qatar's Foreign Minister Khaled al-Attiyah said there was no way his country would be stripped of its right to host the World Cup. "It is very difficult for some to digest that an Arab Islamic country has this tournament, as if this right can't be for an Arab state," he told Reuters in an interview in Paris. "I believe it is because of prejudice and racism that we have this bashing campaign against Qatar."
For its part, Russia dismissed concerns it might lose the right to host the cup. "Cooperation with FIFA is going on and, most importantly, Russia is continuing preparations for the 2018 World Cup," President Vladimir Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said.
BLATTER PRESSURE
A source close to FIFA said it was Blatter's advisers who had told him he must quit. Critics pointed to the widening criminal probe, disquiet among sponsors, and pressure from European soccer body UEFA as possible reasons.
View gallery
Re-elected FIFA President Sepp Blatter gestures during news conference after an extraordinary Execut …
FIFA has denied that another senior official, Secretary General Jerome Valcke, was involved in a $10 million payment appr2oved by the South African Football Association that lies at the heart of the U.S. investigation.
At a news conference in Johannesburg, sports minister Fikile Mbalula confirmed the payment to Warner during the bid process but denied it was a bribe. Mbalula said the cash was intended for soccer development in the Caribbean.
Valcke said on Wednesday he was not guilty of corrupt practice relating to the payment and he saw no reason to resign.
Blatter announced his decision to step down six days after police raided a hotel in Zurich and arrested several FIFA officials, and four days after he was re-elected to a fifth term. Blatter has not been charged and FIFA did not respond to a request for comment on his being under investigation.
An election to choose a new president will probably not take place until at least December. Blatter, meanwhile, remains in his position.
Former England captain David Beckham, who was a major figure in England's failed bid to host the 2018 World Cup, joined the chorus of calls for change at FIFA. "Some of the things that we now know happened were despicable, unacceptable and awful for the game that we love so much," he told Sky Sports.
LEADERSHIP CANDIDATES
Among potential candidates to lead FIFA, UEFA chief Michel Platini, a former French international soccer star, is the favorite, ahead of Jordan's Prince Ali Bin Al Hussein, who withdrew from last week's presidential election after winning 73 votes to Blatter's 133 in the first round.
Chung Mong-joon, billionaire scion of South Korea's Hyundai conglomerate, said he would consider running.
Other possible candidates include Domenico Scala, the
independent chairman of FIFA's audit and compliance committee, Jerome
Champagne, a former French diplomat and FIFA deputy secretary general,
and German Wolfgang Niersbach, an ex-media chief at FIFA. Former
international stars Zico and Diego Maradona have also been mentioned.
(Writing by Giles Elgood; Editing by Grant McCool and Ian Geoghegan)
Culled from Reuters
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










