In all the
presentations , I have done in pension related matters , numbering about 3500,
spanning over a period of 7 years in the following sates Zamfara,
Nasarawa, Abuja , Enugu, Imo , Abia, Kwara, Osun, Lagos etc in both private and public sectors, the most
re occurring question is how safe is my contribution.
The safety of
any fund is the basic criteria in setting up the fund, when a fund has no
safety; it is of no use in setting it up.
The
objectives of the scheme in PRA 2004 were as follows:
Ensure
that every worker receives his retirement benefit as at when due
Assist
workers to save in order to cater for their livelihood during age
Establish
a uniform set of rules, regulations, and standards for administration of
pension matters
Establish
strong regulatory and supervisory framework.
But
in 2014 the PRA 2014 extended to the following
Establish a uniform set of rules , regulations, and
standards for the administration and
payments of retirement benefits for the public service of the federation, the
public service of the FCT, the public service of the state governments, the
public service of the local governments and the private sector Section 1 subsection A of the PRA 2014
Assist
the improvident individuals by ensuring that they save in order to cater for
their livelihood during old age Section 1 subsection D of the PRA 2014
Make
provision for the smooth operations of the scheme
Ensure
that every person who worked in either the public service of the Federation,
FCT, States and Local Governments or the private sector receives his retirement
benefits as and when due Section 1 subsection C of the PRA 2014
In an article by Odunze which appeared in
2011, titled “The Task of managing and safeguarding the pension
fund” Odunze
opined that “With the call in Europe and America for an
extension of the retirement age due to the failure of the pension schemes as a
result of the last global financial crises, it becomes pertinent for the
pension fund administrators, the pension fund custodian and the National
pension commission . PenCom to embark on stringent financial and investment
strategies to put the schemes on sound footings. This becomes necessary to
safeguard the pension fund”
The failures of
the National Provident Fund Act of 1973, The Pension Act of 1990 and the NSITF
Act of 1993 are all fresh in our memories. The business environment is becoming
more and more complicated, so also is the human nature and behavior. They all
fail because of several reasons, which included corruption, not maintaining a
good data base, not proper oversight function, non challant attitude of the
officials involved.
The Pension
Reform Act 2004 clearly pointed the provisions of Pension fund custodian,
pension fund Administrator and the National pension commission and careful
delineated their duties that serves as checks and balances to the
establishment, administration and running of the schemes to make it safe and
profitable to both the contributors, retirees, and return on assets to the
administrators and other stakeholders in the scheme.
The recent
amendment of the 2004 Pension Reform Act, which resulted in its repeal and the
subsequent provisions of the Pension Reform Act 2014 will positively
consolidate more on the pension assets as the relevant portions of the law has
increased the coverage to states, local governments, and employers with minimum
of three employees.
There is also the consolidation of the
pension reform act as aptly captioned by the highlights of the pension reform
act 2014, it should be noted that “The
Pension Reform Act 2014 has consolidated earlier amendments to the 2004 Act,
which were passed by the National Assembly. These include the Pension Reform
(Amendment) Act 2011 which exempts the personnel of the Military and the
Security Agencies from the CPS as well as the Universities (Miscellaneous)
Provisions Act 2012, which reviewed the retirement age and benefits of
University Professors. Furthermore, the 2014 Act has incorporated the Third
Alteration Act, which amended the 1999 Constitution by vesting jurisdiction on
pension matters in the National Industrial Court.
Punishment
for defaulting employers
: the pension reform act in Section 11
(6) of the Act provides that an employer who fails to deduct or remit the
contributions of its employees within 7 working days from the date salary is
paid, in addition to making the remittance already due, will be liable to a
penalty to be stipulated by the Commission.
Furthermore, Section 105 (1& 2) on offences under the Act empowers the National Pension Commission (PenCom), subject to the fiat of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), to institute criminal proceedings against employers who persistently fail to deduct and/or remit pension contributions of their employees.
Furthermore, Section 105 (1& 2) on offences under the Act empowers the National Pension Commission (PenCom), subject to the fiat of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), to institute criminal proceedings against employers who persistently fail to deduct and/or remit pension contributions of their employees.
With
all these provisions, the scheme has the necessary provision to ensure
compliance and safety of the fund as pension fund custodians are expected to
have an indemnity of three times the value of their fund, in the case of
custodian going bankrupt.
Like
Jonny Walker we are not deterred by where we failed, but we set our minds on
our destination and that is why we are bent on the safety of the fund that has
clearly manifested with the recent remarks by the DG , stressing that the
pension assets is well in excess of 4.6 Trillion Naira.
Odunze Reginald is the Lead
Consultant, Chareg Consulting, a management and marketing consultant a social media and social marketing consultant
, you can visit our twitter anchor @regydunze, find us on Facebook @ Reginald
No comments:
Post a Comment