New research calls the venerable 80% income-replacement rule into question
New research indicates
that retirees—especially in higher income brackets—might need to replace
less of their pre-retirement income than they think.
Financial
planners have long suggested that individuals replace 80% of their
income in retirement from various sources to maintain the same standard
of living they had while working.
But
in a recent article in Research magazine, Michael Finke, a professor at
Texas Tech University in Lubbock, notes that the rule doesn’t
necessarily reflect how a person’s income grows while he or she is
working—nor how expenses change and even decline in retirement. What’s
more, the guideline focuses on gross income rather than take-home pay.
Consider:
In retirement, you likely no longer contribute to Social Security,
Medicare and your retirement account. That means your replacement rate
is down to no more than 77% of your final year’s salary—or 60% or less
if you use average lifetime income, Prof. Finke says.
If
you subtract other expenses—commuting and a lower federal income-tax
bill (assuming you’re in a lower tax bracket in retirement than you were
in your working years)—the replacement rate falls lower still.
“The
80% rule is wrong because it’s too simplistic,” Prof. Finke says. “Most
of us don’t want to replace our gross income. We want to replace our
paycheck.”The guideline, he adds, is especially distorted for high-income Americans.
“The
highest 20% of earners aren’t even spending half of their gross
income,” he says. “So if you think they need 80% of their gross income,
then they’d have to spend more in retirement than they’d ever spent
during their working years—and this doesn’t sound like a good life
plan.”
So, what’s a better way to figure out how much income you need?
First,
if you’re at, or very near, retirement, you can use your actual target
consumption, says David Blanchett, head of retirement research at
Morningstar Investment Management, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Chicago-based fund-research company Morningstar Inc. For those still
several years or more from leaving the office, the key is pinpointing
what specific expenses will change at retirement and adjusting one’s
replacement rate accordingly. “A household that is saving 20% of their
pay, for example, in a 401(k) needs to replace a lower percentage of
their final pay than one saving only 5% because they are used to living
off less,” Mr. Blanchett says.
Prof.
Finke adds: “Most of the wealthiest retirees don’t spend down their
money at all. This means that if they didn’t want to give it to their
kids they could have had a lot more fun when they were younger.”
Culled from Wall Street Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment