The safety of the Pension Fund- Odunze Reginald C

In a presentation in 2009 in Abuja , a customer reacted that his father could not access his money in the defunct old scheme, we took time to explain the differences in the schemes and the modalities for his father to access his fund.

Even though he finally access his funds, it was a difficult task convincing him to partake in the new scheme.

In all the presentations , I have done in pension related matters , numbering about 3000, spanning over a period of seven  years in the following sates  Zamfara,  Nasarawa, Abuja , Enugu, Imo , Kwara, Osun, Lagos etc  in both private and public sectors, the most re occurring question is how safe is my contribution.

The safety of any fund is the basic criteria in setting up the fund, when a fund has no safety; it is of no use in setting it up. Therefore we commend the National Pension Commission ,  as the pension assets hit 5 trillion Naira and still counting.

In an article by Odunze which appeared in 2011, titled “The Task of managing and safeguarding the pension fund” Odunze opined that  “With the call in Europe and America for an extension of the retirement age due to the failure of the pension schemes as a result of the last global financial crises, it becomes pertinent for the pension fund administrators, the pension fund custodian and the National pension commission . PenCom to embark on stringent financial and investment strategies to put the schemes on sound footings. This becomes necessary to safeguard the pension fund” But this has since becomes as the fund is continuously appreciating.

The failures of the National Provident Fund Act of 1973, The Pension Act of 1990 and the NSITF Act of 1993 are all fresh in our memories. The business environment is becoming more and more complicated, so also is the human nature and behavior. They all fail because of several reasons, which included corruption, not maintaining a good data base, not proper oversight function, non challant attitude of the officials involved.

The Pension Reform Act 2004 clearly pointed the provisions of Pension fund custodian, pension fund Administrator and the National pension commission have careful delineated duties that serves as checks and balances to the establishment, administration and running of the schemes to make it safe and profitable to both the contributors, retirees, and return on assets to the administrators and other stakeholders in the scheme.

The recent amendment of the 2004 Pension Reform Act, which resulted in its repeal and the subsequent provisions of the Pension Reform Act 2014 will positively consolidate more on the pension assets as the relevant portions of the law has increased the coverage to states, local governments, and employers with minimum of three employees.

 There is also the consolidation of the pension reform act as aptly captioned by the highlights of the pension reform act 2014, it should be noted that   “The Pension Reform Act 2014 has consolidated earlier amendments to the 2004 Act, which were passed by the National Assembly. These include the Pension Reform (Amendment) Act 2011 which exempts the personnel of the Military and the Security Agencies from the CPS as well as the Universities (Miscellaneous) Provisions Act 2012, which reviewed the retirement age and benefits of University Professors. Furthermore, the 2014 Act has incorporated the Third Alteration Act, which amended the 1999 Constitution by vesting jurisdiction on pension matters in the National Industrial Court. 

Punishment for defaulting employers : the pension reform act  in Section 11 (6) of the Act provides that an employer who fails to deduct or remit the contributions of its employees within 7 working days from the date salary is paid, in addition to making the remittance already due, will be liable to a penalty to be stipulated by the Commission.

Furthermore, Section 105 (1& 2) on offences under the Act  empowers the National Pension Commission (PenCom), subject to the fiat of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), to institute criminal proceedings against employers who persistently fail to deduct and/or remit pension contributions of their employees.

With all these provisions, the scheme has the necessary provision to ensure compliance and safety of the fund as pension fund custodians are expected to have an indemnity of three times the value of their fund, in the case of custodian going bankrupt.

Like Johny Walker we should not  be deterred by where we failed, but we set our minds on our destination and that is why we are bent on the safety of the fund.

Odunze Reginald is the Lead Consultant, Chareg Consulting, a management and marketing  consultant  a social media and social marketing consultant , you can visit our twitter anchor @regydunze, find us on Facebook @ Reginald odunze and reginaldodunze.com, at google+ @ Reginald Odunze and at Linkedin@reginald odunze.