The federal government on Thursday withdrew the charges of criminal conspiracy relating to the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Orders, 2015, filed against Senate President Bukola Saraki and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, at the Abuja High Court.
In doing so, the Ministry of Justice
filed an application to amend the charges and attached the amended
charges. In the new charges, only the former clerk of the National
Assembly, Mr. Salisu Maikasuwa, and a former deputy clerk, Mr. Ben
Efeturi, were listed as the accused persons.
Saraki and Ekweremadu were charged
alongside Maikasuwa and Efeturi for allegedly forging the Senate
Standing Orders. All of them pleaded not guilty to the charges and were
granted bail. They were first arraigned before Justice Yusuf Halilu on
June 10, 2016.
However, a litigation officer from
the Ministry of Justice, Odudu Loveme, yesterday deposed to an
affidavit, which was attached to the new charges.
Loveme averred that the prosecutor, Aliyu
Umar (SAN), had on September 30, in the Office of the Director of
Public Prosecution told him that he had studied the case diary and “had
decided to amend the charges in the manner stated on the face of the
motion paper”.
He stated that he had consequently filed
the amended charges. He said: “That I depose to this affidavit in good
faith believing same to be correct to the best of my knowledge and
information and in accordance with the Oaths Act Cap 01 Laws of the
Federation of Nigeria.”
On the face of the new charge, only Messrs Maikasuwa and Efeturi would now face prosecution.
Count one of the new charge reads: “Salisu Maikasuwa and Benedict Efeturi, on or about the 9th day of June 2015 at the National Assembly Complex, Three Arms Zone, Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, agreed to do an illegal act, to wit to make the Senate Standing Orders, 2015 (as amended), without the authority of the 7th Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which act was committed by yourselves and that you thereby committed the offence of criminal conspiracy.”
Count one of the new charge reads: “Salisu Maikasuwa and Benedict Efeturi, on or about the 9th day of June 2015 at the National Assembly Complex, Three Arms Zone, Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, agreed to do an illegal act, to wit to make the Senate Standing Orders, 2015 (as amended), without the authority of the 7th Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which act was committed by yourselves and that you thereby committed the offence of criminal conspiracy.”
They were also accused of fraudulently
amending the 2015 Senate Standing Orders without the authority of the
7th Senate “with the intention that the senators-elect of the 8th Senate
would believe that the said Senate Standing Orders, 2015 (as amended),
was made by the authority of the 7th Senate of the Federal republic of
Nigeria”.
They were accused of forging a document
punishable under Section 366 of the Penal Code Act (Northern States)
Federal Provisions Act, 1960, Cap 345, Laws of the Federation, 1990 (as
amended).
The federal government also accused them of giving false information with the intention to mislead the public.
The court had on September 28 adjourned the matter to today, October 7 for commencement of hearing.
Justifying the amendment, Umar said that the sole issue for determination was “whether the court can permit the amendment of the charge in terms of the amended charge”.
The court had on September 28 adjourned the matter to today, October 7 for commencement of hearing.
Justifying the amendment, Umar said that the sole issue for determination was “whether the court can permit the amendment of the charge in terms of the amended charge”.
According to him, the court has the
powers to permit the amendment based on the provisions of Section 216(1)
of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.
The section states that “a court may
permit an alteration or an amendment to a charge or framing of a new
charge at any time before judgment is pronounced”.
He also quoted Section 216(3), which
states that “where a defendant is arraigned for trial on an imperfect or
erroneous charge, the court may permit or direct the framing of a new
charge, or any amendment to, or the alteration of the original charge”.
When the federal government charged
Saraki and Ekweremadu for the alleged forgery, both of them had
maintained their innocence, saying that it was politically motivated
arising from their emergence as Senate President and Deputy Senate
President, respectively.
Their election did not sit well with the
presidency and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), which had
backed Senators Ahmed Lawal and George Akume to lead the Senate.
The decision to withdraw the charges against them may also not be unconnected to weakness of the federal government’s case against them.
The decision to withdraw the charges against them may also not be unconnected to weakness of the federal government’s case against them.
THISDAY had reported two weeks ago that
the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) was faced
with the dilemma of amending the charges against Saraki and Ekweremadu,
because the charges that had been filed in court were baseless and could
not hold water.
Culled from Thisday
No comments:
Post a Comment